When I began http://www.corruptwa.com a little over one year ago, I get phone calls, emails, letters that are all about children being yanked from homes and placed in foster care. I don’t have children of my own but what I’ve come to know about this “business” has me very angry with those who are to look out for the best interests of children – our legal establishment.
In many cases, (one is too many in my view) those with this legal responsibility who take children from families often place these children with ‘child molesters,’ ‘ex-criminals’, ‘welfare addicts’ and ‘sex traffickers’. The blame for this is because of the GREED of our legal establishment, which looks past their own misconduct. Why? Because for each child placed within foster care the state receives Federal money. I’ve not been able to determine how much money, but it seems from “Internet Research re legal child abductions” each child is worth around $25,000 to the State. To say it another way, the State has created an industry based in stealing children.
A few months ago I learned of a “custody/dependency” battle taking place in Kitsap County Superior Court and I wanted to monitor the trial and hear how these cases work their way through the courts. Judge Kevin Hull is the judge presiding over this case. That means Judge Hull is the sole person who determines if children are returned to their family or placed in foster care. Said another way, Judge Hull has the power to increase the revenue of the State by $25,000/child; three children in this case — $75,000. All it takes is the strike of his gavel! Such POWER!
Early June, with the trial already underway, I began monitoring the proceedings. And it didn’t take long before I saw and heard the’tactics’ our “trusted public servants” will use to prove the children be placed in “foster care”. The WA State Attorney General, through Peter Kay, Esq., WSBA #24331, is that “public servant” and he should be disbarred!
Here is why. In the presence of all parties, counsels, witnesses, the general public (me), and judge Hull, Peter Kay bolted over to where the father was sitting and accused the father of “tape recording” the proceedings. Peter Kay, pointed to a device of the father’s and claimed it was a recorder that had this special program that would convert spoken words to text. He demanded the father “bring up” the program…bring up the “previous page”…. The entire incident went on for a few minutes until the father handed Peter Kay, Esq., WSBA #24331, the device. Kay went to work searching though the device and discovered that 1) no taping occurred, 2) the device didn’t have this “spoken text program” and 3) was never used as a tape recorder. After all this nonsense by our “Trusted” Attorney General, that proved “A FALSE ACCUSATION” by a lawyer sworn to “TRUTH and HONOR”, Judge Hull DID NOTHING! I was outraged! Think about it this way, Peter Kay is claiming the father displays irrational tendencies and frequent “outbursts” in court. And for this REASON Judge Hull should award the STATE the custody of his three children.
As a citizen who witnessed this “breach of TRUST” by a lawyer, Peter Kay, and a Judge, Kevin Hull, and the utter hypocrisy in claiming “irrational behavior” on the part of the father, when he is subjected to “irrational behavior” in the course of a trial, was OVER THE TOP. I had to do something!
I filed to INTERVENE so as to ADDRESS these ‘breaches of trust’ and violations of a person’s “fair” hearing and not be subjected to harassment of the kind I witness by Peter Kay, Esq.
GUESS which JUDGE was to hear this Scheidler Motion to Intervene? NONE other than JUDGE KEVIN HULL!!! Judge Hull is a witness to the conduct of Peter Kay. Hull is a potential party for NOT sanctioning PETER KAY for his “irrational conduct.” And Hull is a member of the same good-ole-boys club as Peter Kay, the WA STATE BAR.
When Judge Hull called the Motion for hearing, I argued that he must “disqualify himself” as the LAW requires for the reasons stated above!
RCW 2.28.030 Judicial officer defined — When disqualified.
A judicial officer is a person authorized to act as a judge in a court of justice. Such officer shall not act as such in a court of which he or she is a member in any of the following cases:
(1) In an action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she is a party, or in which he or she is directly interested….
The LAW is crystal clear, a JUDGE cannot sit on a case in which the JUDGE is involved as a party or in which the judge has an interest in the subject matter of the case — In this Motion, the subject matter involves every Lawyers statutory obligations to Truth and Honor — both Hull and Kay are bound by this law — RCW 2.48.210!
And just like Judge Keith Harper refused to “disqualify himself” as the law requires, so too Judge Hull refused to “disqualify himself” as the law requires.
In protest in not being provided a “qualified” judge, I withdrew my motion and now will file a CJC grievance against Judge Hull as I did against Judge Keith Harper. (the CJC grievance against Judge Keith Harper has yet to be assigned to an “investigator” — I guess the CJC is having a difficult time finding “team player”)
So once again it seems Judge Keith Harper was right when he told me that if I wanted a fair venue I should try the “moon or Mars”.