You're Reading...
Judges, Lawyers

Grand Jury Foreman arrested for doing what he was told to do – because he reported legal misconduct!

A Florida man, 70-years old, was summoned to serve on a Grand Jury. After being impaneled by the state’s attorney, he was made “jury foremen.” However when he learned of crimes being committed by “court personnel” he was arrested for doing what he was required to do under the laws and procedures that define the ‘duties of the Grand Jury Foreman”, which was to bring the evidence of these crimes to the attention of the full Grand Jury for their deliberation.

This is the interview that everyone needs to listen to… and listen to it to the end! After hearing what this 70-year old man has done to try to report legal corruption within the courts, and how he is being punished for doing it, all the “dots” that are scattered throughout our web site,, will be linked together and validate the “RICO” lawsuit we are initiating and the RICO lawsuit Anne Block is also planning on filing.

Please listen to this interview between Jason W. Hoyt and Terry Trussell — PLAY INTERVIEW

The direct link that can be copied and pasted in your browser is

About Brandia

I am an animals rescuer, a mother, a grandmother, a minister, & a human being who is tired of all the corruption going on in our state.


7 thoughts on “Grand Jury Foreman arrested for doing what he was told to do – because he reported legal misconduct!

  1. During an employment discrimination lawsuit against the State of Washington Departments of Ecology and Fish and Wildlife filed about 10 years ago, I tried to have the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington hold a jury trial for violations of state laws pursuant to the Seventh Amendment. The trial had been wrongfully denied by Washington courts, and because of purjury committed during the proceedings and alterations of documents provided by the State, I included the RICO statute among those being violated. Judge R. Bryan dismissed the case with the opinion that a RiCO statute complaint cannot be filed against the government or government employees. This decision was rubber stamped in a non-prededential opinion by the Ninth Circuit. I can only wish you success in showing this decision to be illegal and invalid.


    Posted by Charles Heckman | September 20, 2014, 11:39 am
    • We are all beginning to understand how this racketeering organization operates. We are focused on the WA State Bar Association and how their tentacles reach into government in how they carryout their schemes. So the WA State Bar will be the RICO focus while the judicial, legislative, and executive branches, while infected by the corrupt organization, are ‘negligent’ in their duty to serve citizens and not award Bar members – i.e., diversion of public assets, for the Bar’s RICO activities. BUT as is clear, our courts are nothing but Bar members so the game is rigged from the start… which is clearly prima facie evidence of this RICO enterprise and government corruption. Said another way, the Bar engages in RICO, government employees engage in “official misconduct under RCW 42.20” and other “color of law” violations.

      So i don’t know if the 9th will look at this case in the same way as in your case… we are still in the ‘initial phases’ of these lawsuits.


      Posted by Chief Activist | September 20, 2014, 12:21 pm
  2. I have thought and thought about how to sum up this situation we are faced with. To sum it up in a manner that would adequately portray the “TRUE” state of the “Emergency Situation” that clearly exists within both State & Federal Judiciaries. Not only the unjust wrongful intentional malicious Damages, Injuries, Felonies, clear violations of Statute, FRCP, To Oath of Office, Violations to our NON EXISTANT RIGHTS that we are currently attempting to bring to the Light of Justice. Including the severe menacing lethal threat this Out of Control Organized Crime RICO Felony committing Judicial Corruption poses to everyone in the future. Not the distant future, but now & now.

    How “FAR” reaching this Severe Organized Crime RICO Criminal Felony Judicial Corruption was. Encompassing the State Bar Association, the CJC, U.S. Attorneys Office, Our Dual Branch Biased Governors Office, the AGO, Both the FBI & U.S. Marshal’s Service, both Criminal & Civil Dept.’s of the Pierce County Sheriff’s Dept., The Pierce County Superior Court Prosecuting Attorneys Office, the Clerks Offices of these various respective Courts both State & Federal. the U.S.Trustee Office, etc. The trail of Corruption leads right up to the Door of Our Chief Justice’s Office of the Wa. State Supreme Court.

    Whereas it is the Chief Justices JOB to monitor, manage and self Police these Wa. State Courts & Bar Association. But I have personally provided Chief Justice Madsen & Supreme Ct. Clerk , Also Task Force Agent for the WSBA Mr. Ron Carpenter with signed documented verifiable proof of the WSBA intentionally committing Felony Fraud to defraud me of $288,712.36, so as to Obstruct Justice and hide the liability of the Superior Court for allowing the multiple appearances to practice Law by an unlicensed Attorney. Aid & Abet this unlicensed attorney to conspire to defraud, execute the Fraud itself, embezzlement of thousands of dollars of my money, color of Law force me into a totally un-needed & un wanted Bankruptcy.

    The Reply I received back from Madsen & Carpenter was that they were not concerned with the conduct or daily decision making of the Executive Officials of the WSBA. Therefore would not assist me nor would they be responding to any further correspondence from me concerning this issue.

    I had also provided them with much more undeniable documented verifiable proof of criminal felony RICO Corruption within other Superior Court Cases directly related to this one, but it did not matter. The Supreme Court Chief Justice and Clerk & Task Force Agent of the WSBA refuse to investigate, refuse to police themselves as fraudulently Stated they do police themselves. Which is one of the final dots in this chain of RICO.

    Point being this is clearly 100% contrary to the intended and designed purpose of the Judicial System & Law Enforcement. It most certainly is not to violate our rights, violate the Law , or violate more of them while they cover for each other doing just that! Suppose to protect and serve, uphold the Law and our Rights.

    So we end up down at Risk Management because the Judicial System is so out of Control and encased with severe deep rooted RICO Organized Crime Corruption, it has rendered itself defunct. Incapable of providing Unbiased, Non Corrupt, Due Process Honoring, Lawful & Equally Fair Legal Proceedings. Incapable of producing justice or performing legal honest services. Furthermore retain approx. .04% of the necessary desire to successfully accomplish this.

    So what does RISK MANAGEMENT do??? They turn it over to the very same Attorney Generals Office who I just recently personally witnessed insist that Judge Harper deny Bill’s Demand for an unbiased jury proceeding in his case, violate RCW that requires an unbiased Jury proceeding, Violate his Oath to Office and openly deny to provide Bill Due Process of Law in that Superior Court!.

    And this is who is handling our cases at Risk Management??

    We are spinning our wheels. Wasting time, money, our lives. Which is exactly what they have “JUDICIALLY ENGINEERED” AND EXACTLY WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THIS TO CONTINUE FOR EVER. JUDICIALLY ENGINEERED to beat us down, exhaust us mentally , emotionally , financially, physically, socially etc. All to Obstruct Justice, Cheat & Defraud the innocent victims and the future innocent victims that have yet to have their lives, careers, credit illegally wrongfully destroyed by this lethal menace that calls itself our Government.

    So what and who is allowing this to take place??? Where did this RICO Corrupt Judicial System obtain the Flagrant Nerve & Bold Face Confidence to perform these outrageous violation of Law, FRCP, Oath to Office, Our Guaranteed Rights & commit these deplorable most serious Felony crimes . Arrogantly, Openly & Spitefully war upon 100% innocent citizens????

    It has to be with the “ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE GUARANTEE” that they will not receive any interference from Senators, Congressmen, State Representatives, Law Enforcement. Or otherwise this group of unthinking spineless criminals that are infatuated with holding each others little hands so as to illegally gang up on us and violate the Law, our Rights and the entire Purpose of their being at all, WOULD NEVER DREAM OF EXECUTING THIS TREASONOUS BEHAVIOR AND COMMITTING THESE HORRIBLE FELONY CRIMES. LET ALONE WITH THE CONTINUED INCREASING OCCURANCES OF THIS ACCOMPANIED WITH THE INSANE BOLD CONFIDENCE THAT THEY WILL GET AWAY WITH THIS AND WE WILL HAVE NO ONE TO TTURN TO WITH AUUTHORITY TO STOP THEM.

    Our U.S. Senators, State Senators, Congressmen, State Representatives and Governor are not representing us, upholding the Law or our Rights and have openly refused to do so. Just like Governor Inslee did with me, Congressman Reichert, Senator Becker, U.S. Senator Murray, U.S. Senator Cantwell, The FBI, the U.S. Marshals Service, The Pierce County Sheriff’s Dept.


    Otherwise it would never be , let alone continue. It would be stopped dead in their corrupt tracks, as soon as some of them started to get busted, watch them squirm and all start hiding assets and hiding their files.



    Posted by Bruce Gambill | September 20, 2014, 3:06 pm
    • Your analysis is right on the mark… these “spineless criminals” continue to commit horrible crimes because they can get away with their crimes… The reason is explained in the “class complaint at section A

      When all the ‘criminals – WA State Bar associates’ hold government office, they can protect their own and “obstruct” any interference in their criminal enterprise by others.

      Our country is nearing a point of no return because the ‘closet doors’ are opening and the skeletons are being exposed for all to see. These criminals (lawyers and their friends) have commandeered our government and there is nothing to replace it except to establish a new government or by revolt to remove those who hold total control in violation of law.


      Posted by Chief Activist | September 20, 2014, 4:45 pm
  3. Pedrina v. Chun, 97 F. 3d 1296 – Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1996

    We summarily reject the tenants’ RICO claims against the city. In Lancaster Community Hosp. v. Antelope Valley Hosp., 940 F.2d 397, 404 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1094, 112 S.Ct. 1168, 117 L.Ed.2d 414 (1992), we held that “government entities are incapable of forming [the] malicious intent” necessary to support a RICO action. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of the city from this action.

    The issue of Mayor Fasi’s RICO liability, however, may not be disposed of so easily. 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) makes it unlawful for “any person employed by or associated with any enterprise … to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity.” In Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170, 185, 113 S.Ct. 1163, 1173, 122 L.Ed.2d 525 (1993), a RICO action against an accountant, the Supreme Court interpreted this provision as requiring some degree of participation “in the operation or management of the enterprise itself.” In accordance with this standard, we held in Baumer v. Pachl, 8 F.3d 1341, 1344 (9th Cir.1993), that a lawyer who merely executed his professional duties and who had no managerial role in the alleged enterprise, should be exonerated of liability under RICO. The Reves court further noted that the requisite managerial role might be played by individuals who were “`associated with’ the enterprise” and “who exert control over it as, for example, by bribery.” 507 U.S. at 184, 113 S.Ct. at 1173.

    In the case before us, the district court reasoned that because there was no evidence that the mayor had attempted to direct the company’s affairs, the bribery allegations levelled against him would not suffice to impute liability to him under the Reves “control by bribery” standard:

    This is not … the classic situation where a defendant uses bribes to control an enterprise. Rather … RHCC was allegedly using bribes to control the actions of outsiders. Plaintiffs have not submitted evidence suggesting that Fasi himself attempted to exert control over RHCC, or to direct the operations of the corporation.

    906 F.Supp. at 1420. However, the issue of Mayor Fasi’s control over the alleged enterprise in this case is muddied by the fact that, when asked about his participation in YYVC affairs, he invoked the Fifth Amendment. In Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318, 96 S.Ct. 1551, 1558, 47 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976), the Supreme Court held that “the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them.” Accordingly, one might properly glean from the mayor’s invocation of the privilege that he played a greater role in the business of the alleged enterprise than he now argues.

    Nonetheless, any negative inferences to be drawn against the mayor on this point are undermined by the fact that the essence of the tenants’ claims against him is that he was improperly influenced by the company. Indeed, among the plaintiffs’ allegations are claims that the alleged bribes paid to the mayor “were intended to, agreed to and did influence Governmental Defendants to abstain from communicating to Plaintiffs their rights, or requiring Defendant/developers to inform Plaintiffs of Plaintiffs’ rights under the CUP, and to abstain from punishing Defendant/developers for having concealed Plaintiffs’ said rights.” These allegations in themselves demonstrate that the wrongful conduct of which the mayor is accused relates not to his management of the alleged RICO enterprise, but rather to his having been controlled by it. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s finding that the plaintiffs’ allegations against him fail to establish a RICO violation.


    The above shows how not to present your allegations in the complaint..

    RICO is both, (1) a civil cause of action for use by everyday citizens, and (2) criminal cause of action, for use by only government prosecutors.. KNOW THE DIFFERENCE !! It’s called standing to bring a cause of action..

    Citizens can not file a criminal RICO complaint under federal causes of action…

    Is the The Washington State Supreme Court dba The State of Washington the controller of the enterprise ?



    Posted by James Barber Sr. | September 21, 2014, 1:58 pm
  4. Boulware v. Department of Insurance, Dist. Court, CD California 2009

    The Eleventh Amendment bars suits in federal court for money damages against state officials in their official capacities. See Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989); Romano v. Bible, 169 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 816 (1999); Bair v. Krug, 853 F.2d 672, 675-76 (9th Cir. 1998) (Eleventh Amendment barred RICO and state law claims against state officials in their official capacities). Thus, Plaintiff may not sue the state official defendants for damages in their official capacities.[3]
    [3] In his Motion for Reconsideration, Plaintiff contends that his official capacity claims against Defendants Poizner, Favis, Ferris, Lawrence, Staal, McKerren and Bridgewater are limited to claims for injunctive and declaratory relief only, pursuant to Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908). However, this alleged limitation is not clear from the Complaint.


    Posted by James Barber Sr. | September 21, 2014, 2:25 pm
  5. Yeah, Dr. Heckman raised this point above and it needs to be analyzed… From the literature reviewed so far, a RICO claim must first be made to the AG… if they decline to prosecute than a citizen has standing… Re our lawsuit, RICO is noted as one of other causes of action — and – the RICO charge – is against the Bar and its associates. It also notes violations of 42 USC 1983 and violations of state law, RCW 9A.82.100, which is WA’s version of RICO and this statute provides standing to prosecute under RCW 9A.82.100(1)… so standing isn’t a problem for those who are joining in the claim as each have been injured. Also, because there are government players in these claims and crimes — which is essentially the diversion of public assets to accomplish a non-government act, any WA State ‘taxpayer’ would have standing under common law doctrine.

    All of what is planned needs close analysis and every possible “defense” has to be accounted for. Thanks for the info and case law!


    Posted by Chief Activist | September 21, 2014, 2:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Please Consider a Donation

We couldn't do this without you!
wordpress visitors
Washington State Bar Watch

Keeping Watch On Washington Lawyers

Snohomish County Sheriff's Watch

Keeping An Eye On Those In Power

Research Advocates NW

Finding Answers To Life's Mysteries

Trump Tracker

Keeping Track of the 45th's Alternative Facts

Missing and Murdered of Snohomish County

Because all life matters and none should be forgotten

Washington Activist

Private Information Sharing for Washington Activists

Real Estate Scams

Broken Dreams... Broken Lives

Clark County Conservative

Stateside Associates Listed 2012 “Best Local Politics Blog”

WA Social Justice Initiative

A grassroots community to help attain "Justice" for those unable to go it alone.


Res ipsa loquitur - The thing itself speaks

John Wills Lloyd

These are some personal views about living, loving, hoping, and such.

Fighting Corruption In Stevens County

The struggle for freedom lives here

Rose Marie Adams

The Evil That Lurks Within

Corrupt Washington

Fighting For Change

Did You Check First?

It's fine to have an opinion. It's better to know the facts.

Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America and our Children who Want to Come Home


The Lizard Farmer

"You can't starve us out and you can't make us run 'cause we're them old boys raised on shotguns" -Bocephus


Call for compliance with 2010 UN Human Rights Sexual Assault Response

Protecting Peoples Rights

The sworn duty of all public servants

Rcooley123's Blog

Rick Cooley's Blog


Social Justice

No Loss for Words

Thoughts from a Back Bencher!


The website where movies count

We Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident

that all men are created equal

Simply Sumptious

at the Corrigan Cafe

Free Obituaries & Memorials

In Loving Memory of Those We Have Loved & Those We Have Loved

The Unraveling

Just another weblog

Spokane Police Abuses: Past to Present

The People of Spokane vs. Law Enforcement Abuse, Impunity, Corruption, and Cover-up

Spiritual Man

The Journey to a Spiritual Life


A topnotch site

WatchBlog: Official Blog of the U.S. Government Accountability Office

GAO provides fact-based, nonpartisan information to Congress. The WatchBlog offers short, shareable insights from GAO reports on a wide variety of topics.


Welcome to the world of cats!

Tuck The Law Dog site

Snohomish County Reporter

Standing for those who cannot stand for themselves


Lake Stevens news source. Your community news source by choice. On Twitter @LSNewsSpot. Send news tips to:

Queen City +Addendum

Years ago, I thought up the name Queen. It's just a name. But it's regal, obviously, and -sounds splendid. ~ Freddie Mercury

Roger Goodman - Not A Good Man

The truth has finally come out... and it's not pretty.

Straight from the Horse's Heart

A Spiritual Ride through Love, Loss and Hope

Animal Law News & Abuse

Animal Rescuer & Owner resource site: news, views, civil rights, & politics

Dairy Carrie

Running the world while ignoring the dishes.

Don Charisma

because anything is possible with Charisma

The Dark Side of Animal Rescue

Stories about struggle, hope and love

Up on the Woof

Biscuits of dog-related stuff from author & animal advocate, C.A.Wulff

So Stupid ~ It's True

Stories from around the country that are so stupid that they have to be true

On the Mark

about our enemy the state

%d bloggers like this: