The “legal establishment” has created an insolvable riddle that traps all citizens in their quest for justice. This “design” by the legal establishment gives them “absolute” control over citizens. Said another way, the “constitutions of the United States and the constitution here in WA State” means what the “legal establishment” wants it to mean. Citizens have NO legal recourse — except by “permission or by revolt.” Basically it works as illustrated below — A JUDGE makes any ruling, decision, factual finding, etc., that serves his own interests – either personal interests or professional interests. What typically occurs next is how citizens are trapped by such “absolute” power commandeered by the legal establishment.
Those who are following the legal proceedings in my case against Felice Congalton, Associate Director WA Bar Association, and J. Reiko Callner, Executive Director, Commission on Judicial Conduct will appreciate this TRAP from which there is no escape.
To summarize my case… a lawyer, Scott Ellerby, lied. A grievance was filed and dismissed. A lawsuit was filed and dismissed. A grievance against the judge was filed and dismissed. An appeal to the Court of Appeals was made. Justice Joel Penoyar lied in his “rendition” of my appeal so as to protect all the lying lawyers and judges. A grievance against Penoyar for lying was made to the CJC. It was dismissed. A motion to ‘vacate’ the judgement for “fraud upon the court” due to the misconduct of these attorneys and judges. The motion was denied … you get the idea.
All grievances against all attorneys and judges for their blatant violation of law, let alone violations of their oath and code of conduct are almost always dismissed by the WA State Bar and the Commission on Judicial Conduct — WITHOUT investigation. These “regulatory agencies” are completely within the “judicial br” — NO INDEPENDENT regulatory agency… NOT EVEN Citizens under their “inherent” power embodied in Article 1, Section 1, have “inherent power.”
SECTION 1 POLITICAL POWER. All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.
Well… here we go again. Another ‘grievance against Judge Keith Harper [the judge who said try the “moon or Mars” if you want a fair venue] has been filed with the Commission on Judicial Conduct for his violation of law — Harper failed to “disqualify” himself due to the inherent “conflict” that is illustrated above…. any guess as to what the commission on judicial conduct will do with this grievance?
Complaint against Judge Keith Harper
Snohomish County Reporter 
Who exactly are the members of the CJC? Or is that secret? And how many of them are still active in the field of law, and how many are retired and no longer have any connection with the field other than possibly using the CJC as platform to ensure themselves “immunity” from the law ?
LikeLike
Posted by Hugh Whinfrey | April 13, 2014, 6:14 pmMember Current Term Ends
Sherry Appleton 6/16/17
Joseph G. Bell 6/16/15
Larry D. Goldberg 6/16/17
Judge John A. McCarthy
Connie Michener 6/16/17
Kathleen O’Sullivan, Attorney Member 6/16/15
Judge George Fearing 6/16/15
Michael J. Pontarolo, Attorney Member 6/16/16
Judge Margaret Vail Ross 6/16/13
Bonnie White 6/16/14
Betsy Wilkerson 6/16/16
Alternate Members
Member Current Term Ends
Robert Alsdorf, Attorney Member
-Alternate for Michael J. Pontarolo 6/16/16
Frances Bessermin
-Alternate for Joe Bell 6/16/15
Neal Blacker
-Alternate for Sherry Appleton 6/16/17
Richard Carlson
-Alternate for Bonnie White 6/16/14
Judge John Erlick
-Alternate for Judge John A. McCarthy 6/16/14
LikeLike
Posted by Bill S | April 13, 2014, 6:27 pmVery interesting. Thanks, Bill.
LikeLike
Posted by Hugh Whinfrey | April 13, 2014, 6:57 pmAnd which CJC members consider themselves to be personal friends and acquaintances of the various defendants in the set of underlying lawsuits and complaints in turn forming the basis for this complaint. These folks do not all live in the same town, and it would be relevant to know who has spent how many nights in whose homes over the past ten years as well as the extent of any private social get-togethers so that the strengths and natures of the various interrelationships can be fully disclosed. The risk in the opposite event could be a failure to disclose highly relevant biases.
LikeLike
Posted by Hugh Whinfrey | April 13, 2014, 6:37 pmWhen you look at the structure of our ‘third branch’ and how they only answer to themselves, the inbreeding is institutionalized.
Reference: http://www.courts.wa.gov/programs_orgs/
LikeLike
Posted by Bill S | April 14, 2014, 6:57 amNo. 45478 -5
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
Ederi Haggenmiller, Pro Se Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES,
STATE OF WASHINGTON Respondent.
ON APPEAL FROM THE
SUPERIOR COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Before
The Honorable Keith Harper, Judge
OPENING BRIEF OF APPELLANT…a public record of the court.
That the Court adjudges and decrees that defendants
have engaged in the conduct complained of herein RCW
42. 20. 040- “fraud on the court”
LikeLike
Posted by Ederi Haggenmiller | September 3, 2014, 1:41 pmEderi, could you provide your opening brief…. As you are aware, the “judicial branch” is under attack by use and they are now on the “defensive” and will “protect their turf” to the last judge. If you find “justice denied” please consider joining us in a our ‘class claim’ that will document how the WA State Bar, by the association of members, have violated the law for their own benefit – regardless of the Bar members office or duties. Wa State’s lawyers are a RICO, who happen to occupy significant government positions… this is going to be a fight of significant proportions and we need all those who have been violated by these corrupt judges (Keith Harper for sure) to join this cause.
LikeLike
Posted by Bill S | September 3, 2014, 5:03 pmhttp://www.courts.wa.gov/search/index.cfm?fa=search.start_search
if the name Haggenmiller is searched, the opening,response and reply will appear, the reply date is august 21 2014, looking good so far as the response was file / no filed.
LikeLike
Posted by Ederi Haggenmiller | September 3, 2014, 6:37 pm